Autograph letter from Louis Racine to Gerhardus Nicolaus Heerkens, written from Paris and dated 6 January 1757, discussing Rousseau, Voltaire, and Damien’s attack on Louis XV.
Detailed Summary:
Racine begins by saying that he had received the verse attached to Heerkens’ letter, but that he has not yet received the beginning of the work which Heerkens had told him would be returned to him by one of his friends. He then goes on to discuss the “impertinent” article on Rousseau in Bayle’s supplement. He notes that Heerkens will find in Trévoux’s second brief of the month a letter from him in which he states that such slanders that hatred has dictated deserve only contempt. Racine then discusses a “violent fermentation” in the minds of the public, stating his hope for peace. He concedes, however, that given the King’s last response to the reprimands that this still seems very far away. He then comments on Damiens’ attempt to assassinate Louis XV of France the day before he wrote this letter on 5 January 1757. Racine notes that much is known of Damiens’ family and life story, but little of the plot itself, and quotes the King who remarked that if the blow is struck from abroad it is but a scratch, but if the blow comes from his people it is a deep wound. Racine concludes by discussing the seven octavo volumes that constitute Voltaire’s Histoire universelle, adding that Voltaire’s bold reflections and lively style encourage Racine to read all that he writes. He notes that Voltaire imposes on the ignorant, but will never impose on the savants who will not seek in him the truth of history.
The paper is watermarked with a shield, topped with a crown, bearing a post horn.
Countermark:
Binding:
Unbound
Additional Comments:
There is some minor staining to the upper right-hand corner of f.1r, and minor foxing along the bottom edge of the MS. The wax seal is largely extant on f.2v and has caused some damage to the same. The MS was folded using the ‘Tuck, Fold, and Seal’ method.
Several passages throughout have been underlined in pencil. There is a minor correction to l.13 of f.1v and l.5 of f.2r in the form of corrected text being written over the top of incorrect text. Two postmarks have been drawn over the top of the address on f.2v. in red pencil.