The writer expresses surprise and admiration for the recipient’s undertaking of a useful project, despite their own advanced age and inability to contribute directly. They comment on the complexity and scale of the genealogical work described, noting a discrepancy in the count of ancestors across generations. Additionally, the writer corrects a historical inaccuracy regarding the role of secretaries of state and muses on the differing genealogical traditions across cultures. They conclude with respectful regards and acknowledge the recipient’s dedication to both history and faith.