More results
The writer expresses surprise and admiration for the recipient’s undertaking of a useful project, despite their own advanced age and inability to contribute directly. They comment on the complexity and scale of the genealogical work described, noting a discrepancy in the count of ancestors across generations. Additionally, the writer corrects a historical inaccuracy regarding the role of secretaries of state and muses on the differing genealogical traditions across cultures. They conclude with respectful regards and acknowledge the recipient’s dedication to both history and faith.
D’Adhémar begins by discussing the royal reception of Voltaire’s Histoire universelle, adding that the Queen was touched by the brevity of the eulogy because friendship is not always fair. He then questions why Voltaire names Monteil, as the Bishop Legate to the Pope in the first Crusades as this Bishop was instead an Adhemar ancestor. He goes on to discuss Adhemar genealogy.
© 2025 VOLTAIRE STUDIO